How can you set up RMS-based protection to the documents users store in SharePoint?

You can use Windows Rights Management Services (RMS) to protect SharePoint documents in the two most recent releases of SharePoint; SharePoint Server 2010 and SharePoint Server 2007 both include RMS support. However, there are some restrictions and complexities you should be aware of if you plan to set up RMS with your SharePoint installations.

An important thing to know is that RMS can only encrypt SharePoint documents and subject them to RMS access control restrictions when they are downloaded from a SharePoint 2010 or SharePoint 2007 document library. RMS doesn't leave SharePoint documents encrypted while they're stored on the SharePoint server. This restriction exists so that SharePoint can index and scan the documents on a SharePoint storage provider. RMS applies its restrictions to a document only right before it's downloaded to a client computer. Similarly, when an RMS-protected document is uploaded to a SharePoint site, RMS removes all protection from the document until a new download request is received.

SharePoint-RMS integration ensures that security restrictions are enforced even after a document has left a SharePoint server, which is something that can't be achieved using the standard SharePoint permissions. SharePoint-RMS integration also automatically enforces an organization's RMS document security policies. A SharePoint administrator can centrally define different RMS policies for the document libraries hosted on a SharePoint server. Therefore, individual users don't have to decide what protection they need to apply to documents they post in SharePoint libraries. RMS permissions are defined at the SharePoint document library level: Documents in a library automatically inherit the library's RMS permissions. This protection applies to both existing and new documents in the SharePoint library.

The RMS protection of SharePoint data is, just like the RMS protection that's bundled with Windows and Microsoft Office, only possible for certain file formats. Out of the box, it supports Word, Excel, PowerPoint, InfoPath, and XPS files. Extensions to apply RMS protection to other file formats (e.g., .pdf, .cad) can be added through special software from Microsoft partners such as Liquid Machines (now part of Check Point Software Technologies) and GigaTrust.

RMS support for SharePoint can be set up using either RMS SP2 or RMS V2, which is bundled with Windows Server 2008. Provided you already have a functioning RMS infrastructure, enabling RMS protection in SharePoint is relatively straightforward. The main configuration actions are

• enabling RMS support on the SharePoint server
• setting the actual RMS restrictions in the configuration of a given document library

You can enable RMS support in SharePoint by selecting either the Use the default RMS server specified in Active Directory or Use this RMS server option in the Information Rights Management section of the SharePoint Central Administration\Operations configuration section.

To set RMS restrictions on a SharePoint document library you must use the Information Rights Management section in the Permissions and Management configuration section of the document library. When you select the Restrict permission to documents in this library on download check box, you can further refine the RMS protection as follows:

• Allow users to print documents.

• Enforce users to verify their credentials every x number of days. This setting can be useful when someone who has access to RMS-protected confidential data leaves your organization; the individual will retain access to the data only for x days after his or her last successful authentication to an RMS server.

• Reject files that don't support Microsoft Information Rights Management (IRM). Selecting this option results in SharePoint rejecting the upload of document formats that don't support RMS.

• Remove RMS protection on a particular date. This setting is useful for publishing company financial results, for instance. After the quarterly results are published, the RMS protection policy on the quarterly results SharePoint library automatically changes -- meaning that the RMS restrictions are removed.

Microsoft provides more detailed guidance on how to set up SharePoint-RMS integration in the article "Deploying Windows Rights Management Services with Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007 Step-By-Step Guide," which is available from Microsoft's website.

Courtesy: www.sharepointpromag.com

Top 10 SharePoint 2010 Configuration Mistakes -- and How to Fix Them

Microsoft SharePoint 2010 is a complicated beast, with more knobs and levels than you can shake a stick at. It's no wonder we get some of them wrong from time to time. Over the past year and a half of installing SharePoint 2010, you may see some configuration mistakes, mostly with your own hands. In this article, Top 10 of these errors are covered. Explained is what the correct configuration, why it's correct, and how to correct the setting in your farm. If you make all the changes in this article, you'll have the beginnings of a beautiful farm -- and one less likely to be ridiculed by your friends and neighbors.

Mistake #1: Scrimping on SharePoint's RAM or Hard Disk Space

If you've seen it once, you'll seen it a hundred times: a poor, defenseless SharePoint server working as hard as it can to keep users happy, but having its hands tied because of limited resources. This situation is usually a casualty of aggressive virtualization. Virtualization itself isn't bad, but it must be done intelligently and without sacrificing SharePoint's ability to do its job. 

If SharePoint finds itself starved for RAM, it starts shutting off functionality so that it can fit into the available space. It also caches less in the web application pools and recycles those pools more often. Less caching and more recycles result in a degraded end-user experience, as SharePoint must compile the same ASP.NET code over and over. And no one likes unhappy users, not even their mothers. 

The solution to this particular issue is easy: Add RAM. Microsoft has published the hardware requirements for SharePoint 2010 in the TechNet article "Hardware and software requirements (SharePoint Server 2010)."  These requirements state that at the very least, each SharePoint 2010 production server should have 8GB of RAM and a C drive with at least 80GB. In many cases, that won't be enough. If your servers are in production, you can watch their memory utilization to see whether they use the entire 8GB of RAM. If so, they could use more. If your servers are not yet in production, you can use a variety of load-testing tools to simulate your intended load and see how the servers hold up. For example, you can download the Microsoft Load Testing Kit, part of the SharePoint Administration Toolkit. 

As for your C drive, SharePoint itself doesn't need much space, but Windows does. After all, your server has several years of Windows patches to look forward to. While you're adding drive space to your machine, consider adding a secondary drive as well. This drive is a great place to store all the files that you use when you install SharePoint. All the third-party installation files can go there too. You can also have SharePoint put its log and Search index files on this drive. This approach takes some pressure off the C drive. Happy C drive and happy end users equal a happy SharePoint server administrator.

Mistake #2: Using Virtualized Microsoft SQL Server

As It's been said in mistake #1, virtualization isn't bad. But virtualization allows administrators to make mistakes on a much grander scale. Take virtualizing SQL Server. In the context of SharePoint, this process can be especially painful. The main mistake I see when virtualizing SQL Server is overcommitting the host, be it through RAM, CPU, or drive space. Because everything in SharePoint is stored in SQL Server, if SQL Server is slow, SharePoint is slow. 

The obvious solution is to move SQL Server to a physical box, on which it doesn't need to share resources. Moving SharePoint's SQL Server instance is easy, thanks to aliases. The Process is outlined, with pictures, at www.toddklindt.com/sqlalias. 

If you can't get a physical SQL Server box, then at the very least ensure that your virtualized SQL Server instance has a fighting chance. First, make sure that its virtual drives aren't thin provisioned. I/O is one of the areas in which virtualized SQL Server struggles the most, and thin-provisioned drives exacerbate that problem. Also try to put the SQL Server guests' virtual drives on their own spindles on the host. Doing so should improve I/O by preventing SQL Server from fighting other guests for time with the drives. Finally, you shouldn't allow the virtualization host to overcommit its RAM. If the host must swap to meet its RAM obligations, then it's slowing down SQL Server. 

Brent Ozar has recorded a brilliant video on how best to virtualize SQL. Go get some wine and pizza, invite your fellow SharePoint admins, dim the lights, and watch that video. You'll learn a lot.

Mistake #3: Using the Farm Configuration Wizard

Using the Farm Configuration Wizard was a pretty common mistake when SharePoint 2010 first came out but thankfully has diminished as our familiarization with SharePoint 2010 has increased. The wizard's list of atrocities is long, so I'll just cover some of the better known ones. First, and maybe most heinous, is that all the databases that the wizard creates have nasty globally unique identifiers (GUIDs) at the end of their names. The wizard also creates a content web app, at http://servername, that just doesn't scale well. To add insult to injury, the wizard creates your My Site host on that same web app, at http://servername/my. Finally, the wizard encourages you to create service applications that you might not actually use. It's tough to resist the siren song of those check boxes, I know. 

The Farm Configuration wizard leaves its dirty handprints all over SharePoint, and it can be a challenge to clean up all of them. However, a few places can be easily fixed. Start with your web apps. Create a web app for My Site and give it a Fully Qualified Domain Name (FQDN), such as mysites.company.com. Create a My Site host at the web app's root. Use the Windows PowerShell cmdlet Move-SPSite to move any My Site to one content database, and then attach that content database to your new web app. You'll also need to adjust your User Profile Service and tell it about your new My Site location.

Next, clean up your service applications. Go through your list of service applications and delete any that you aren't using. You gain no benefit from having a service application that you aren't going to use for another six months. After you've deleted unnecessary service applications, stop the associated service instances (also called services on server) that power them. If possible, remove the GUIDs from the service application database names. The technique for completing these tasks varies among service application; the Microsoft article "Rename or Move Service Application Databases (SharePoint Server 2010)"  has directions for all the service applications. Of course, take good backups before doing any of this.

Mistake #4: Using an Incorrect URL when Creating a Content Web App

Like any relationship, SharePoint and Microsoft IIS have communication problems from time to time. Web app creation is one of those times. SharePoint doesn't tell IIS about changes that you might make to a web app after it is created. For instance, if you create an Alternate Access Mapping (AAM) for a web app in Central Administration, you still need to go into IIS and add the host header for the new address. 

The issue is compounded when SharePoint farms that you never thought would need to be accessible from the Internet suddenly need to be accessible from the Internet. Budding SharePoint administrators commonly give their web apps short URLs, such as http://portal, to save users some typing. Of course, that URL doesn't route across the Internet, so the web app needs a fully qualified URL added to its stable of AAMs. Not only is this new URL not written to the IIS host headers, but it's also missing from all the alerts, workflows, and anything else that saves URLs -- all those items have the old URL hard-coded in. Because SharePoint didn't write any additional URLs to IIS when they were created, it won't write them to any new SharePoint servers that are added to the farm. Nor will SharePoint write these changes to IIS if the Microsoft SharePoint Foundation Web Application service instance is stopped and started. 

This issue might not seem like a big deal, but it has bitten many people at the worst possible time: during an outage. In a few cases, administrators have lost or needed to rebuild a SharePoint server and forgotten about the host headers that they put in manually months earlier. SharePoint is up and going, but when browsing to SharePoint, end users get the blue IIS 7 splash page instead of the SharePoint page that they were expecting. Again, unhappy users usually mean unhappy administrators. 

Because SharePoint writes host headers only when a web app is created, you can't fix problematic web apps. You'll need to recreate them. That's good news and bad news. The good news is that you won't lose any of the content that your users worked so hard to create. The bad news is that you will lose all the settings that you worked so hard to create. 

The first step is to make notes of all your web app settings. In most cases, there won't be many, and you'll be familiar with any changes that you made. Then, detach the content databases from your web app. Keep them safe; you're going to need them. Next, make a copy of the web.config file for that web application. Some settings, such as forms-based authentication (FBA) and BLOB cache settings, are in that file. Finally, go into Central Administration and delete the web app. Tell SharePoint to delete the extra stuff. The scary part is over. 

Now, recreate the web app, but do it right this time. First, enter the correct, fully qualified URL in the Host Header box. Do your end users a favor, and put the web app on port 80, as Figure 1 shows. Under the Security Configuration settings, accept all the defaults, even if you're going to use Kerberos or SSL. You can change those settings later, and you want to make sure that the web app works correctly before you apply fancy security settings. Doing so helps in any troubleshooting that you might need to do. Under the Application Pool settings, pick an existing application pool. (Explain why in the next section.) 

It is important to give your content databases distinct names. You should be able to look at a content database name and know exactly which web app that database goes with. This is another one of those things that doesn't usually seem important but is priceless in a disaster-recovery situation. If the content databases that you detached from the web app before you deleted it didn't have such names, then take this opportunity to right that wrong when you recreate the web app. Give the new content database a good name, then use the PowerShell cmdlet Move-SPSite to move the site collections to that new database. If your content database already has a good name, enter it during the creation of the new web app. If you had multiple content databases, attach the rest after the web app is created. 

After the web app is created, you can tweak settings as needed. Most settings can be changed in Central Administration. If you made any changes to the web.config file of the original web app, now is the time to copy those changes to the newly created web.config file. You can use a program such as Notepad++  to compare the two files. You should now have a well-created web application that you can trust in times of crisis.

Mistake #5: Running Web Apps or Service Apps in Separate App Pools

Web apps and service applications run inside of an application pool, which is a W3WP.exe process that runs on your server. Unless you have reason to do otherwise, you should run all SharePoint web apps inside one application pool; the same goes for the service applications. Running each web app in its own application pool makes inefficient use of the server's memory. Each application pool has a minimum overhead of more than 100MB, and its memory footprint increases as it caches content that's rendered frequently. Figure 2 shows multiple W3WP.exe processes running as sp_webapps, the result of web apps running in separate application pools. We've all experienced SharePoint slowing first thing in the morning because the app pools recycle overnight and need to warm up and cache that content again. Well, multiple application pools mean that the same content is cached multiple times. Most users are impatient. I'm sure that studies would show that they spend the time waiting for SharePoint to respond by thinking of ways to punish us for SharePoint's poor performance. 

 

For service applications, this problem is easy to fix. First, make sure that you have a good service application pool to use. Recommend is calling this pool Default SharePoint Service App Pool so that it floats to the top of all your drop-down lists. Use a dedicated sp_serviceapps account for the pool's identity. Most service applications allow you to assign them to a new service application pool by modifying their properties in Central Administration. If the option is unavailable there, look for it in PowerShell. 

Web applications are a tougher matter. There's no easy, out-of-the-box way to change the application pool that a web app is using. Fortunately, we have PowerShell at our disposal. The steps to this process won't fit in this article, but I outline them in detail in the article "How to change the App Pool ID of a SharePoint 2010 Web Application."

Mistake #6: Using One Account for Everything

Security is complicated, and SharePoint doesn't necessarily make it any easier. Using just one account -- maybe even the coveted Domain Administrator account -- is so easy. We've all done it, even though it's a bad idea. When you use an existing account, you open up SharePoint to several security issues. Anyone who knows the account password can do anything in SharePoint, so you can't separate duties. You also lose the ability to audit who made which changes. And if that common account password is compromised or needs to be changed, you jeopardize SharePoint's uptime as well. Even if you use one dedicated account for SharePoint, you leave yourself vulnerable to attack. If that account is compromised via a security exploit, the bad guys will have access to everything in SharePoint. 

To fix this mistake, start by creating the accounts that that is outline in this blog post . Add the sp_webapps and sp_serviceapps accounts as managed accounts. Use the techniques that are describe in Mistake #5 to fix your web app and service application accounts. You can change the default content access account for the Search service application at the Search Service Application page. Under Central Administration, Security, Configure Service Accounts, you can change the accounts that other processes use as well. (You can even change the Farm Account there.) If you're using the User Profile Service, make sure that your new sp_userprofile account has the correct permissions in Active Directory (AD), and recreate your AD connection in the User Profile Service. 

You can also use the steps that are described in "How to create a SharePoint 2010 admin account and stop using sp_farm" to give an account the correct permissions to administrate SharePoint, without needing to use another highly privileged account.

Mistake # 7: Keeping Default SharePoint Database Settings

When SharePoint creates its multitudes of databases, it makes some bad assumptions. Take the autogrow settings: The database files grow by 1MB at a chunk, almost ensuring that they're going to autogrow with every upload. Not only does this slow down SQL Server (which slows down SharePoint), but it also results in database files that are spread all over your drives in itty-bitty 1MB chunks. 

SharePoint also creates most of its databases, notably the Config and Content databases, with the recovery model set to Full. Although this is great if you want to recover data, you must manage the process correctly or those sneaky .ldf files will slowly, methodically fill your hard disk. If you think users get upset when SharePoint is slow because of fragmented databases, you should see how angry they get when SharePoint stops completely because the SQL Server drives are full. 

To fix this mistake, set your databases' autogrow settings in such a way that they don't need to grow frequently. For most farms, Recommend is to change the 1MB autogrow to something like 500MB or 1GB. Autogrow should also be a last resort. Someone, either the SharePoint administrator or a dedicated DBA, should pregrow your databases so that autogrow is unnecessary. 

Your recovery model setting needs to be consistent with your disaster recovery plans. If you need your transaction logs, make sure you're performing routine log backups to keep those .ldf files in check. If you don't need your transaction logs, then consider switching your databases to the simple recovery model. Doing so will keep your .ldf files from swelling up like a nasty bee sting.

Mistake #8: Not Enabling BLOB Caching

I don't know about you, but I've never heard an end user say, "SharePoint is too fast. Could you get it to respond a bit more slowly?" We all want SharePoint to get files to the users as quickly as possible. However, more often than not, I see SharePoint farms without BLOB caching enabled. BLOB caching is one of the easiest and least expensive ways to improve SharePoint performance. Not only does it help to get files to users more quickly, but it also eases the burden on SQL Server. Everybody wins. 

This might be the easiest solution so far: Enable BLOB caching, of course! BLOB caching is actually a function of IIS; SharePoint just takes advantage of it. Therefore, to enable BLOB caching requires a change to each web app's web.config file on each server. Fortunately, the setting already exists and just needs to be enabled. By default, the web.config files are in a directory under C:\inetpub\wwwroot\wss\virtualdirectories. Each web app has a directory and a web.config file. Open one of these files and look for the following line: 

""

To enable BLOB caching, replace "false" with "true" and save the web.config file. You should also move the file to a directory on a drive other than the C drive. The maxSize parameter is measured in gigabytes, with a default of 10GB. If the space is available, you might want to increase this size. 

If editing this file in Notepad on all your servers isn't your idea of fun, you can use PowerShell to automate the process. You still need to perform the process on each server, but using PowerShell is quicker and reduces the chances of a mistake. To begin, download the script and save it to a file named blobcache.ps1. This script contains two functions: Enable-SPBlobCache and Disable-SPBlobCache. Each function takes a web app from the pipeline and enables or disables BLOB caching on that app. The code to enable BLOB caching on each web application in the farm looks like this:

PS E:\Install\Scripts> . .\blobcache.ps1

PS E:\Install\Scripts> Get-SPWebApplication | Enable-SPBlobCache

Mistake #9: Not Installing a PDF iFilter

Most organizations have a tremendous number of PDF files in their SharePoint farms, and those files represent a wealth of information. End users want to be able to discover that information by using SharePoint Search. Getting users excited about SharePoint Search is a great way to get them excited about SharePoint in general. 

Installing a PDF iFilter is fairly easy. Adobe has a free PDF iFilter that you can install. You can find the download link and detailed installation instructions in the Microsoft article "SharePoint 2010 - Configuring Adobe PDF iFilter 9 for 64-bit platforms." You need to install the iFilter only on those SharePoint servers that run the Search Index role, although installing it on the rest of your SharePoint servers doesn't hurt. If you have a large farm and want to reduce the time needed to index your PDF files, you can use the PDF iFilter from Foxit. This product has better performance than the Adobe iFilter but isn't free.

Again, you can harness PowerShell to make this task easier. Brian Lalancette, creator of AutoSPInstaller, wrote a great script that automatically downloads, installs, and configures a PDF iFilter, and this script has become my preferred method. The script is part of a larger package, so I've stripped out the relevant parts and posted them on this page.  Save that file as pdfsearch.ps1. The file contains two functions: Configure-PDFSearch and Configure-PDFIcon. The former installs and configures the iFilter; the latter adds a PDF icon to the SharePoint interface. As I describe for the script in Mistake #8, install the functions by dot-sourcing the pdfsearch.ps1 file and then executing the function.

Mistake #10: Not Pointing Your SharePoint Servers at Themselves

When SharePoint works, it is magnificent. When it doesn't work, it can be a nightmare to fix. For this reason, anything you can do to ease troubleshooting is time well spent. To that end, make sure that every server in the SharePoint farm points to itself for all web apps. If you get sporadic reports about SharePoint not responding, you can easily use RDP to log in to each server and try to pull up SharePoint. If this attempt works, then you know that the server is working. If SharePoint does not come up, then you know in exactly which Microsoft User Location Server (ULS) logs to look for the relevant errors. No worrying about which web front end the load balancer sent my request to. The quicker you get to the correct log files, the quicker the problem is resolved. 

Pointing your Search indexer at itself has another advantage: It improves performance for your end users. If you don't point your Search server at itself, then when it starts to perform a crawl, it lets DNS do its work and then starts crawling whichever web front end DNS points it to. That server is most likely the same one that is sending pages to your end users. Making the server do double-duty means that everyone waits longer. Pointing the Search server at itself means that your web front end doesn't need to handle that traffic and can get back to doing its #1 job: keeping users happy.
There is a simple fix for this mistake: Open the hosts file (C:\windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts) on each SharePoint box, and add all the URLs that SharePoint knows about. Point those URLs to 127.0.0.1, which translates to "this computer." Figure 3 shows how this file looks in a typical SharePoint environment. This approach provides all the benefits that I've mentioned but uncovers a nasty beast: loopback detection. This monster, as well as how to defeat it, is scary and too long for this article, but you can read all about it in my blog post "Can’t crawl web apps you KNOW you should be able to crawl." 

This script will automatically add all SharePoint's URLs to your server's local hosts file and fix the loopback detection beast in one fell swoop. Is there anything PowerShell can't do? 

Hope this helps.

Curtsey: www.sharepointpromag.com

Shredded Storage in SharePoint 2013 Preview

As you probably know, documents stored in a library or as attachments are stored as binary large objects (BLOBs) in the content database, by default. Remote BLOB Storage (RBS) is a set of APIs that let you move BLOBs out of the SQL Server content database to another storage mechanism. 

You can read whitepaper on BLOB externalization for details. 

In SharePoint 2010, there was opportunity for improvement with both the storage utilization story and I/O performance for documents. In SharePoint 2010, if version history is enabled on a document library, each new version results in a new BLOB for that document. Conceptually, a 1MB file with 10 versions is consuming 10MB of storage. 

What a lot of people don’t consider is that a “new version” doesn’t mean just a change to the document-- it can mean a change to metadata. So if a user changes a metadata field, that is a new version, and a copy of the BLOB is created, even if no change was made to the document itself! 

So BLOBs can proliferate quickly and, to put it bluntly, “pointlessly.” By the way, it’s a best practice to set version retention limits on any library where version history is enabled. 

Second, I/O performance is problematic in SharePoint 2010. There’s an unnecessary file read that occurs when changes—at least to Office documents—are uploaded to the SharePoint web server. 

At the highest level, what SharePoint 2013 shredded storage does is “chunk” or “page” the BLOB into numerous smaller shreds. So a single BLOB is now a construct made up of numerous shreds. 

One result of this architecture is an effect similar to deduplication or single instancing: only differences are saved, not entire BLOBs. So, for example, if you have versioning enabled and a user makes a change to a document, only changed shreds are added to the storage footprint of that document. Shreds that have not changed from the previous version are simply “associated” with both versions. 

You can see significant improvements in storage utilization. That same 1MB file with 10 versions may be consuming 2.2MB of storage, for example. 

Shredded storage also reduces the amount of information about a file that has to be retrieved by the web server from the content database, so I/O improves.

With that conceptual introduction in place, let me punch out a couple of things you need to know, which I’ve found misrepresented in the community:

• Shredded storage is, on the whole, a good thing, and is on by default. 
• You can disable (or re-enable) shredded storage on a per-web application basis. 
• BLOBs are not shredded on an upgrade, but are shredded when uploaded or modified. 
• Shredded storage is SharePoint 2013, running on SQL Server 2008 R2 or SQL Server 2012. 
• Shredded storage is different than Cobalt. Cobalt is a framework that allows Office client applications to efficiently synchronize changes to SharePoint using the File Synchronization via SOAP of HTTP (FSSHTTP) API. Shredded storage is about how a document is shredded, stored, and reassembled by SQL Server. I’m hearing lots of people suggest that shredded storage works only on Office documents. Not true. Such statements are confounding shredded storage with Cobalt. When we look inside a content database on SharePoint 2013, we see PDFs and other file formats being shredded as well. 
• Shredded storage is independent of RBS. You can use RBS with or without shredded storage, and vice versa. Now whether you would use RBS with shredded storage is another question. Folks in the community are currently running tests to determine the performance implications of doing so. My guess is that many of the performance advantages of RBS that I saw with customers, and that both Microsoft and I have documented in white papers, will be reduced or eliminated due to shredded storage. There was also a benefit in SharePoint 2010 to running RBS to store BLOBs on SAN and NAS devices that support deduplication. Shredded storage might very well reduce or eliminate that benefit. However, RBS will continue to be critically important in hierarchical storage management, where you are managing tiers of storage (and therefore cost and other characteristics) based on business rules.

So that’s the “net net” of shredded storage. 

What is still not well documented are the inner workings, so I’ll strive in a future article to detail how it works. Even some of the “official” training and documentation I’ve seen has holes, particularly in relation to the interaction of Cobalt and shredded storage, and how shredded storage does (or does not) help I/O for non-office document formats. 

The good news is you don’t really have to understand how it works, just that it does work. The bottom line is that the SharePoint web server is doing more work, and SQL Server is doing more work, to reduce I/O bottlenecks. Because I/O is likely to be the number-one bottleneck in SharePoint performance, this is all quite desirable. And, along the way, the storage footprint of a document can be reduced—perhaps significantly. 

Each release of SharePoint offers a “feature” that is terribly named (does “shredded storage” sound like a good thing?), poorly documented, and misrepresented in the community. This is one of them for SharePoint 2013. 

Curtsey: www.sharepointpromag.com